TWINT: Quality experiences
Reviewers report mixed experiences with TWINT’s overall quality, with a slight majority expressing negative sentiment, 166 negative mentions compared to 136 positive. The app’s reputation has fluctuated significantly over time, showing a downward trend from late 2025 into early 2026, with ratings dipping as low as 2.43★ in November 2025. However, there has been a noticeable recovery since mid-2026, peaking at 4.14★ in June 2026, suggesting recent improvements. Despite this rebound, recurring complaints about crashes, slow performance, and inconsistent functionality continue to surface, particularly around updates and device compatibility. While some users still praise the app’s reliability and design, the overall sentiment remains fragile, with technical issues undermining trust in the platform’s stability.
What customers praise
Customers who praise TWINT highlight its smooth operation and intuitive design. Many describe the app as reliable and well-built, with one user calling it 'flawless' and another praising its 'great application' and 'convenient way to pay.' The app’s ability to handle payments, money transfers, and QR code transactions is frequently noted as a strong point, with users appreciating its ease of use and integration into daily life. These positive reviews often emphasize the app’s functionality and the value it brings to everyday transactions.
What customers said:
- „really well designed and developed application“
- „Helpful app, to send money conveniently 💵 to friends.“
- „Best app for cash transactions and payment.“
Common complaints
Common complaints center on technical instability, including frequent crashes, slow loading times, and unresponsive behavior. Users report that the app often fails to load transactions, gets stuck in loops during payment splits, or crashes during critical actions like sending money. Some mention that updates have worsened performance, with one user stating the app is now 'the buggiest I’ve ever seen' and another noting it takes over a minute to load transaction history. These issues are seen as disruptive and erode confidence in the app’s reliability.
What customers said:
- „every time I try to see transactions it is crashing!“
- „since the recent update, twint is not only slower,“
- „the app is not responding“
How it has changed over time
TWINT’s quality has shown a clear pattern of decline followed by recovery. Ratings dropped sharply from 3.56★ in August 2025 to 2.43★ in November, coinciding with reports of crashes and broken features. The situation improved in June 2026, reaching 4.14★, likely due to fixes or updates. However, the rating fell again in July 2026 to 2.75★, indicating that problems persist. This cycle suggests that while improvements are made, they are not consistently maintained, and new issues often emerge with updates.
What customers said:
- „already more than 3 months you cannot fix it!“
- „but also removed the credit cards associated.“
- „popping up every 5 sec when trying to make a payment“
Practical takeaways
For users considering TWINT, the key takeaway is that while the app can work well for basic tasks like payments and money transfers, it comes with significant risks related to performance and stability. Users should be prepared for potential crashes, delays, and compatibility issues, especially on non-Swiss devices or with certain bank accounts. The app may not be suitable for high-stakes or time-sensitive transactions. However, those who experience smooth operation often find it highly convenient and recommend it, particularly for everyday use in Switzerland.
What customers said:
- „thanks for ruining an otherwise incredibly well performing app“
- „takes >60 seconds to load the transaction history (no exaggeration)“
- „What's with the constant technical error?“
Over time
Data as table
| Month | Avg. rating | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-08 | 3.56 | 9 |
| 2025-09 | 3.20 | 10 |
| 2025-10 | 2.56 | 16 |
| 2025-11 | 2.43 | 21 |
| 2025-12 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 2026-01 | 3.93 | 15 |
| 2026-02 | 2.85 | 13 |
| 2026-03 | 3.05 | 21 |
| 2026-04 | 3.73 | 11 |
| 2026-05 | 3.20 | 15 |
| 2026-06 | 4.14 | 14 |
| 2026-07 | 2.75 | 20 |
Sentiment over time
Data as table
| Month | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08 | 44% | 0% | 56% | 9 |
| 2025-09 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 10 |
| 2025-10 | 38% | 0% | 63% | 16 |
| 2025-11 | 24% | 5% | 71% | 21 |
| 2025-12 | 40% | 7% | 53% | 15 |
| 2026-01 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 15 |
| 2026-02 | 31% | 8% | 62% | 13 |
| 2026-03 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 21 |
| 2026-04 | 55% | 9% | 36% | 11 |
| 2026-05 | 40% | 7% | 53% | 15 |
| 2026-06 | 79% | 0% | 21% | 14 |
| 2026-07 | 45% | 0% | 55% | 20 |
Customer voices
Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.
„Works flawlessly.“
„I managed to activate the app on my Pixel 10 when geolocation accuracy was very high“
„the requirement may be too strict and I would encourage the developers to be a bit more flexible in this regard“
„Great application provides convenient way to pay.“
„transactions don’t load every time.“
„you’ll often get stuck in a loop of selecting who to split it with.“
„This app has sadly become unusable due to this happening at least a few times each week.“
„always crashing!“