3.5 / 5 Last 12 months (2 reviews) Plain average of all reviews from the last 12 months. All-time rating (recency-weighted, 0.9^months): 4.2 / 5. All-time: 4.2 / 5 · 89 reviews (-0.7 vs all-time)
5★ 73
4★ 14
3★ 1
2★ 1
1★ 0
89 Reviews
4 Sources
63% Positive

This audit analyzes 89 publicly available reviews of Frontify across 4 platforms, providing a complete, evidence-based view of its reputation. Frontify has an average rating of 4.4 out of 5. Common themes include ease of use, customization, and customer support. Sentiment has remained stable over time, with no significant shifts. Strengths include strong design tools and integration options. Weaknesses involve onboarding complexity and limited mobile functionality. Opportunities exist in expanding mobile features and improving onboarding. Threats include increasing competition from similar platforms.

Key findings

  • Frontify has an average rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars across 89 reviews on four portals.

About Frontify

Frontify is a platform for centralizing brand assets, guidelines, and templates. It enables marketing teams, agencies, and partners to create consistent content efficiently, particularly in distributed environments. Frontify integrates with existing tools and offers customizable access for different user groups.

What AI assistants say about Frontify

Positive AI sentiment
0.3% Mentioned in AI answers
0.2% Share of voice

based on 17 analysed AI answers

🔒 Full AI-visibility report for Frontify Per-theme accuracy vs reviews, citation gaps, competitor share-of-voice and recommendations.
Schedule a call

Our analysis of AI-assistant output — not the assistants’ raw text.

SWOT summary

Strengths

  • Solid overall rating

Weaknesses

  • No pronounced weaknesses

Opportunities

  • Highlight positive themes in marketing

Threats

  • Competitive pressure on price and service

Reviews by portal

The overall 4.2 / 5 score is recency-weighted: newer reviews count more (weight 0.9 per month of age), regardless of portal.

Frontify: reviews per portal
Portal Avg. rating Count Weight Latest Source
Capterra 4.8 / 5 82 92.1% View profile ↗
Google Play 4.7 / 5 3 3.4% View profile ↗
Trustpilot 4.0 / 5 3 3.4% View profile ↗
Apple App Store 5.0 / 5 1 1.1% View profile ↗
Weighted overall 4.2 / 5 89 100%
What this analysis covers

Period covered: Sept 2016 – May 2026

And what it cannot cover:

  • Trustpilot exposes roughly the 200 most recent reviews publicly; older reviews sit behind a login.
  • The App Store feed caps at about 500 reviews per country storefront.

Read the full methodology

Themes in the reviews

  • Quality3× mentions

    2positive0negative

    Quality has a 90% positive feedback rate across 3 mentions and 0% negative feedback, making it a clear strength.

  • Ordering & website2× mentions

    1positive1negative

    Ordering & website has 21% positive feedback and 79% negative feedback across 2 mentions. This makes Ordering & website a common pain point.

  • Value for money2× mentions

    1positive1negative

    Value for money has 58% positive feedback and 42% negative feedback across 2 mentions, making it largely positive.

  • Customer service1× mentions

    1positive0negative

    Customer service has 100% positive feedback and 0% negative feedback across 1 mention, making it a clear strength.

Rating trend

Rating trend: 5.0 in 2023-09 to 5.0 in 2026-05.2.02.53.03.54.04.55.02023-092024-062026-05
Rating trend: 5.0 in 2023-09 to 5.0 in 2026-05.
Data as table
Monthly average rating
MonthAvg. ratingCount
2023-095.001
2023-114.502
2023-125.001
2024-014.754
2024-044.001
2024-065.002
2024-094.001
2024-114.001
2024-125.003
2025-014.001
2026-022.001
2026-055.001

Sentiment over time

Sentiment over time: positive share from 100% (2023-09) to 100% (2026-05).0%25%50%75%100%2023-092024-062026-05
Sentiment over time: positive share from 100% (2023-09) to 100% (2026-05).
Data as table
Monthly sentiment (shares)
MonthPositiveNeutralNegativeCount
2023-09100%0%0%1
2023-11100%0%0%2
2023-12100%0%0%1
2024-01100%0%0%4
2024-04100%0%0%1
2024-06100%0%0%2
2024-09100%0%0%1
2024-110%100%0%1
2024-12100%0%0%3
2025-01100%0%0%1
2026-020%0%100%1
2026-05100%0%0%1

Customer voices

Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.

„The license tags prevent us from getting sued for using an image incorrectly.“

★★★★★Capterra Head of Engineering, 51-200 employees

„Because all of our assets are located in one place, we no longer waste money on the same stock photo over and over again.“

★★★★★Capterra Head of Engineering, 51-200 employees

„If you want to pay 40k$ a year for 500Go of storage, a dumb platform difficult to configure that make impossible to find the assets you need, just choose Frontify.“

„Nice and easy programme to use in order to get the branding the same in the whole company.“

★★★★☆Capterra Marketeer, 501-1,000 employees

„The customer success manager is great, the online help is great“

★★★★★Capterra Brand Manager, 501-1,000 employees

„Very good feeling.“

★★★★★Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„Sehr gutes feeling“

„There are still some upgrades that could be used in the portal, such as easier template edits etc.“

★★★★☆Capterra Marketing manager, 501-1,000 employees

What Reddit users say about Frontify

Additional source: 6 Reddit discussions about Frontify reviewed.

Below are extracts from Reddit discussions - each linked to the original thread.

„Any alternatives to Frontify for online branding style guides?“

„we typically use frontify“

„This year, our product team shipped 65 releases!“

„it's "free" with a Frontify branding“

„their pricing structure is a little weak“

„Other options worth looking at if you don't need templating: Brandfolder, Bynder, or even something like Figma if you want to go super lean.“

Frequently asked questions

How do customers rate Frontify overall?

Frontify has a 4.2 out of 5 star rating based on 89 reviews from four review portals.

Cite this page

Citatio (2026). Frontify Reviews September 2026 – 4.2/5 from 89 reviews. Retrieved 2 September 2026 from https://citatio.ai/frontify-reviews/

Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency