3.3 / 5 Last 12 months (39 reviews) Plain average of all reviews from the last 12 months. All-time rating (recency-weighted, 0.9^months): 3.2 / 5. All-time: 3.2 / 5 · 571 reviews (+0.1 vs all-time)
5★ 278
4★ 73
3★ 46
2★ 31
1★ 143
571 Reviews
3 Sources
30% Positive
What reviewers criticize most
  • Ordering & website(20)
  • Customer service(4)

Derived from the analyzed reviews; each chip links to the page with the cited evidence.

This page analyzes 571 publicly available reviews of Beekeeper from 3 platforms, providing a complete, evidence-based view of its reputation. The overall rating, recurring customer themes, sentiment trends over time, and a SWOT summary are all based on the reviews and include direct sources.

Key findings

  • Beekeeper has a 3.2 out of 5 stars average from 571 reviews across 3 portals.
  • Customers rate Communication most positively (4 of 5 mentions positive).
  • Ordering and website receive the most criticism, with 20 out of 24 mentions being negative.

What changed in August 2026

In August 2026, 1 new reviews were analyzed; the average rating moved from 5.0 to 1.0 stars.

New reviews
1
Average rating
1.0/5 (5.0 ↓)
Positive share
0% (100% ↓)

Most-discussed themes

  • Quality — +1 vs prior month

About Beekeeper

Beekeeper is a mobile-first platform for frontline teams that supports communication, task management, and tool access across operational sites. It serves companies with manufacturing plants, retail locations, and logistics operations. Beekeeper enables coordination of employees using mobile devices. Beekeeper has been part of LumApps since 2023.

What AI assistants say about Beekeeper

Positive AI sentiment
0.3% Mentioned in AI answers
0.2% Share of voice

based on 19 analysed AI answers

🔒 Full AI-visibility report for Beekeeper Per-theme accuracy vs reviews, citation gaps, competitor share-of-voice and recommendations.
Schedule a call

Our analysis of AI-assistant output — not the assistants’ raw text.

SWOT summary

Strengths

  • Communication: 91% positive across 5 mentions
  • Quality: 60% positive across 6 mentions

Weaknesses

  • Ordering & website: 85% negative across 24 mentions
  • Customer service: 65% negative across 8 mentions
  • Quality: 40% negative across 6 mentions

Opportunities

  • Address ordering & website to lift overall sentiment
  • Lean on strength in communication in marketing

Threats

  • Ongoing criticism of ordering & website could deter new customers

Reviews by portal

The overall 3.2 / 5 score is recency-weighted: newer reviews count more (weight 0.9 per month of age), regardless of portal.

Beekeeper: reviews per portal
Portal Avg. rating Count Weight Latest Source
Google Play 3.4 / 5 324 56.7% View profile ↗
Apple App Store 3.3 / 5 169 29.6% View profile ↗
Capterra 4.6 / 5 78 13.7% View profile ↗
Weighted overall 3.2 / 5 571 100%
What this analysis covers

Period covered: Sept 2015 – Aug 2026

And what it cannot cover:

  • The App Store feed caps at about 500 reviews per country storefront.

Read the full methodology

Themes in the reviews

  • Ordering & website24× mentions

    0positive20negative

    Ordering & website has 0% positive feedback and 85% negative feedback across 24 mentions. This makes Ordering & website a common pain point.

  • Customer service8× mentions

    2positive4negative

    Customer service is a common pain point, with 19% positive feedback and 65% negative feedback across 8 mentions.

  • Quality6× mentions

    5positive1negative

    Quality feedback is positive in 60% of 6 mentions and negative in 40%. Quality is largely positive.

  • Communication5× mentions

    4positive1negative

    Communication received 5 mentions, with 91% positive feedback and 9% negative feedback. This makes Communication a clear strength.

Rating trend

Rating trend: 4.3 in 2025-09 to 1.0 in 2026-08.1.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.02025-092026-022026-08
Rating trend: 4.3 in 2025-09 to 1.0 in 2026-08.
Data as table
Monthly average rating
MonthAvg. ratingCount
2025-094.254
2025-102.504
2025-113.333
2025-121.001
2026-014.004
2026-023.805
2026-032.754
2026-042.405
2026-053.504
2026-063.002
2026-075.002
2026-081.001

Sentiment over time

Sentiment over time: positive share from 75% (2025-09) to 0% (2026-08).0%25%50%75%100%2025-092026-022026-08
Sentiment over time: positive share from 75% (2025-09) to 0% (2026-08).
Data as table
Monthly sentiment (shares)
MonthPositiveNeutralNegativeCount
2025-0975%0%25%4
2025-1025%25%50%4
2025-1133%33%33%3
2025-120%0%100%1
2026-0175%0%25%4
2026-0260%20%20%5
2026-0325%0%75%4
2026-0440%0%60%5
2026-0550%25%25%4
2026-0650%0%50%2
2026-07100%0%0%2
2026-080%0%100%1

Customer voices

Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.

„getting me in trouble“

„instead grabbed a gif from my image gallery“

„this app glitched out when I was trying to post my till“

„The session keeps closing continuously“

★☆☆☆☆Google PlayTranslated· SpanishOriginal
„la sesión se cierra continuamente“

„Overall, it is a great workflow streamliner“

★★★★★Capterra Packaging Designer, 51-200 employees

„Being able to send messages to specific teams, locations, or departments is a big plus“

★★★★★Capterra Packaging Designer, 51-200 employees

„It doesn’t even tell user which post it was, let alone what the offending language was.“

„we’re cutting down significantly on printing costs and waste“

★★★★★Capterra Head of Marketing and IT, 11-50 employees

What Reddit users say about Beekeeper

Additional source: 11 Reddit discussions about Beekeeper reviewed.

Below are extracts from Reddit discussions - each linked to the original thread.

„Very expensive hobby with a steep learning curve“

Frequently asked questions

How do customers rate Beekeeper overall?

Beekeeper has a 3.2 out of 5 star rating from 571 reviews analyzed across three portals.

From Beekeeper's newsroom

Newsroom items are published by Beekeeper itself.

Cite this page

Citatio (2026). Beekeeper Reviews September 2026 – 3.2/5 from 571 reviews. Retrieved 1 September 2026 from https://citatio.ai/beekeeper-reviews/

Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency