Reviewers report widespread dissatisfaction with sevDesk’s ordering and website experience, with 251 negative mentions compared to just 20 positive ones across 280 total references. The overall sentiment has remained consistently low, with average ratings hovering below 2.5 stars for most of 2025 and early 2026, despite brief improvements in late 2025 and mid-2026. The trend shows a pattern of short-lived gains followed by sharp declines, suggesting ongoing instability in the platform’s core functionality. Many users describe the website and app as unreliable, slow, and poorly designed, with frequent technical failures and broken features. While a small number of users praise the interface’s clarity and ease of use, these positive views are outweighed by consistent complaints about core operations like invoice creation, document upload, and app functionality. The overall trajectory indicates that user trust in the ordering and website experience has not improved significantly over time.

What customers praise

Customers frequently praise the platform’s clean layout and intuitive design, particularly in the web interface. Several users highlight the clarity of the dashboard and the ease of getting started, with one calling it 'super simple and practical for the start.' Others appreciate the straightforward navigation and the ability to quickly create and send invoices. The positive feedback often centers on the visual organization and the perceived value for money, with one reviewer stating there is 'no better tool' available.

What customers said:

  • „Current year!“ - Apple App Store · 5★ · · translated · German ·
    „Current year!“

    Original„Aktuelles Jahr!“

  • „I have just started.“ - Google Play · 5★ · · translated · German ·
    „I have just started.“

    Original„Ich habe gerade begonnen“

  • „The rest is easy to understand“ - Google Play · 5★ · · translated · German ·
    „The rest is easy to understand“

    Original„der rest ist leicht verdtändlich“

Common complaints

The most common complaints revolve around technical failures in the app and website, including crashes, login issues, and unresponsive screens. Users report that the app often fails to open, shows a white screen after login, or requires deinstallation. Critical features like creating offers, uploading documents, and generating delivery notes are frequently broken or missing. Many also note inconsistencies between the app and web version, such as invoices appearing open in the app but closed on the website. These issues are seen as major barriers to daily use.

What customers said:

  • „The app has almost no technical added value for everyday trade work.“ - Apple App Store · 1★ · · translated · German ·
    „The app has almost no technical added value for everyday trade work.“

    Original„Die App hat so gut wie keinen technischen Mehrwert im Handwerker Alltag“

  • „Opening it in a web browser on a smartphone doesn't work either.“ - Google Play · 4★ · · translated · German ·
    „Opening it in a web browser on a smartphone doesn't work either.“

    Original„das öffnen im Web am Smartphone funktioniert auch nicht“

  • „Delivery notes can no longer be created via the app“ - Apple App Store · 1★ · · translated · German ·
    „Delivery notes can no longer be created via the app“

    Original„Lieferscheine nicht mehr über die App erstellt werden“

How it has changed over time

The platform’s performance has shown a volatile pattern over time, with brief improvements in late 2025 and early 2026 followed by sharp drops in user satisfaction. Ratings rose slightly in February and May 2026 but fell again in March and August, indicating that fixes were temporary or poorly implemented. The removal of previously available features, such as offer drafts and full app functionality, without clear communication has fueled frustration. Users feel that updates have introduced more problems than solutions, leading to a loss of trust in the platform’s stability.

What customers said:

  • „Various users have already expressed their dissatisfaction in forums.“ - Google Play · 3★ · · translated · German ·
    „Various users have already expressed their dissatisfaction in forums.“

    Original„Den Unmut haben bereits diverse Nutzende in Foren geäußert.“

  • „Why won't the app open again?“ - Apple App Store · 3★ · · translated · German ·
    „Why won't the app open again?“

    Original„Wieso öffnen die App wieder nicht?“

Practical takeaways

For users considering sevDesk, the current state of the ordering and website experience suggests caution. While the core idea of a simple, visual interface is strong, the execution is unreliable. The app’s inability to consistently perform basic tasks like logging in or uploading documents makes it impractical for daily use. Users should be aware that critical features may be removed or broken without warning. If you rely on mobile access or need to generate offers and delivery notes, the current version may not meet your needs. The platform’s long-term viability in this area remains uncertain.

What customers said:

  • „Receipts are sometimes not loaded correctly“ - Apple App Store · 1★ · · translated · German ·
    „Receipts are sometimes not loaded correctly“

    Original„Belege teilweise nicht korrekt geladen werden“

  • „Why was the previous version with all its features simply deleted?“ - Apple App Store · 1★ · · translated · German ·
    „Why was the previous version with all its features simply deleted?“

    Original„Warum wurde die vorherige Version mit allen Funktionen einfach gelöscht?“

  • „Unfortunately, I can't log into the app“ - Apple App Store · 1★ · · translated · German ·
    „Unfortunately, I can't log into the app“

    Original„Kann mich leider in der App nicht einloggen“

Over time

Rating trend: 1.5 in 2025-09 to 2.4 in 2026-08.1.52.02.53.03.54.02025-092026-022026-08
Rating trend: 1.5 in 2025-09 to 2.4 in 2026-08.
Data as table
Monthly average rating
MonthAvg. ratingCount
2025-091.5018
2025-101.638
2025-112.2010
2025-122.004
2026-012.717
2026-023.605
2026-031.8015
2026-041.577
2026-053.506
2026-063.003
2026-071.605
2026-082.405

Sentiment over time

Sentiment over time: positive share from 0% (2025-09) to 20% (2026-08).0%25%50%75%100%2025-092026-022026-08
Sentiment over time: positive share from 0% (2025-09) to 20% (2026-08).
Data as table
Monthly sentiment (shares)
MonthPositiveNeutralNegativeCount
2025-090%6%94%18
2025-1013%0%88%8
2025-110%10%90%10
2025-120%0%100%4
2026-0129%0%71%7
2026-0260%0%40%5
2026-037%7%87%15
2026-040%0%100%7
2026-0550%17%33%6
2026-0633%33%33%3
2026-070%0%100%5
2026-0820%20%60%5

Customer voices

Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.

„Very clear and well-organized.“

★★★★★Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„sehr übersichtlich“

„If you don't select either, the invoice cannot be assigned.“

★★★★☆Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„Wenn man nichts von beiden nimmt kann die Rechnung nicht zugeordnet werden.“

„It is extremely slow and complicated.“

★☆☆☆☆Apple App StoreTranslated· GermanOriginal
„Es ist extrem langsam und kompliziert“

„They advertise that you can use it with a monthly subscription.“

★☆☆☆☆Apple App StoreTranslated· GermanOriginal
„sie machen Werbung, dass du es monatlich mit Monatsabo nutzen kannst.“

„Quote drafts are not available.“

★☆☆☆☆Apple App StoreTranslated· GermanOriginal
„Angebotsentwürfe nicht verfügbar“

„It's a real shame that you still haven't implemented the quotes feature properly!“

★☆☆☆☆Apple App StoreTranslated· GermanOriginal
„Sehr schade, dass Ihr das Thema Angebote immer noch nicht richtig implementiert habt!“

„The setting should be easy.“

★★★☆☆Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„Die Einstellung sollte ein leichtes sein.“

„This option already existed in Sevdesk but was removed for inexplicable reasons.“

★★★☆☆Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„Die Option gab es bei Sevdesk bereits, wurde aber aus unerklärlichen Gründen entfernt.“
Cite this page

Citatio (2026). sevDesk Ordering & website: customer reviews 2026. Retrieved 18 August 2026 from https://citatio.ai/sevdesk-reviews/ordering/

Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency