3.5 / 5 Last 12 months (215 reviews) Plain average of all reviews from the last 12 months. All-time rating (recency-weighted, 0.9^months): 3.5 / 5. All-time: 3.5 / 5 · 563 reviews
5★ 200
4★ 53
3★ 49
2★ 53
1★ 208
563 Reviews
4 Sources
51% Positive
What reviewers criticize most
  • Quality(142)
  • Ordering & website(87)
  • Customer service(61)
  • Communication(22)
  • Fit & sizing(15)

Derived from the analyzed reviews; each chip links to the page with the cited evidence.

This page pulls together every public review of Personio, 563 in total, spread across four platforms, giving you a full, fact-backed picture of how people really see the service. What follows is the overall rating, recurring themes from users, how opinions have shifted over time, and a concise SWOT analysis, all drawn straight from the reviews and tied directly to their original sources.

Key findings

  • Personio has a 3.5 out of 5 star rating across 563 reviews on 4 review portals.
  • Customers rate Quality most positively (128 of 280 mentions positive).
  • Value for money receives the most criticism, with 9 out of 12 mentions being negative.

What changed in August 2026

In August 2026, 21 new reviews were analyzed; the average rating moved from 3.8 to 4.2 stars.

New reviews
21
Average rating
4.2/5 (3.8 ↑)
Positive share
57% (56% ↑)

Most-discussed themes

  • Quality — -2 vs prior month
  • Ordering & website — +1 vs prior month
  • Customer service — +1 vs prior month
  • Fit & sizing — +1 vs prior month
  • Packaging — +1 vs prior month

What AI assistants say about Personio

Neutral AI sentiment
0.5% Mentioned in AI answers
0.3% Share of voice

based on 29 analysed AI answers

🔒 Full AI-visibility report for Personio Per-theme accuracy vs reviews, citation gaps, competitor share-of-voice and recommendations.
Schedule a call

Our analysis of AI-assistant output — not the assistants’ raw text.

SWOT summary

Strengths

  • Quality: 54% positive across 280 mentions

Weaknesses

  • Value for money: 62% negative across 12 mentions
  • Ordering & website: 52% negative across 152 mentions
  • Durability: 52% negative across 15 mentions

Opportunities

  • Address value for money to lift overall sentiment
  • Lean on strength in quality in marketing

Threats

  • Ongoing criticism of value for money could deter new customers

Reviews by portal

The overall 3.5 / 5 score is recency-weighted: newer reviews count more (weight 0.9 per month of age), regardless of portal.

Personio: reviews per portal
Portal Avg. rating Count Weight Latest Source
Apple App Store 2.9 / 5 252 44.8% View profile ↗
Google Play 2.4 / 5 204 36.2% View profile ↗
Trustpilot 4.3 / 5 78 13.9% View profile ↗
Capterra 4.1 / 5 29 5.2% View profile ↗
Weighted overall 3.5 / 5 563 100%
What this analysis covers

Period covered: Aug 2024 – Sept 2026

And what it cannot cover:

  • The App Store feed caps at about 500 reviews per country storefront.
  • Trustpilot exposes roughly the 200 most recent reviews publicly; older reviews sit behind a login.

Read the full methodology

Themes in the reviews

  • Quality280× mentions

    128positive142negative

    Out of 280 mentions, 54% reflect positive feedback about Quality, while 41% are negative, so overall, it’s a mixed picture.

  • Ordering & website152× mentions

    52positive87negative

    Out of 152 mentions, 40% of feedback about Ordering & website leans positive, while 52% is negative, making it a frequent source of frustration.

  • Customer service119× mentions

    50positive61negative

    Out of 119 mentions, customer service drew 44% positive feedback and 50% negative, making it a frequent source of frustration for users.

  • Communication37× mentions

    13positive22negative

    In 37 instances, feedback about Communication shows up as positive 42% of the time, while 51% comes across as negative. That’s a clear sign Communication keeps coming up as a sticking point.

  • Fit & sizing36× mentions

    14positive15negative

    Out of 36 mentions, 40% of the feedback about Fit & sizing comes across as positive, while nearly as many, 39%, are negative. It’s a mixed bag, really.

  • Durability15× mentions

    5positive10negative

    Out of 15 mentions, just under half, 48%, of the feedback about Durability comes across as positive, while the rest, 52%, lean negative. That imbalance shows it’s a frequent source of frustration for users.

  • Value for money12× mentions

    3positive9negative

    Out of 12 instances, 38% of the feedback on value for money comes across as positive, while 62% leans negative. That’s a clear sign it’s a recurring issue customers keep highlighting.

  • Billing & payment10× mentions

    2positive7negative

    Out of ten mentions, 38% of feedback about Billing & payment comes across positively, while 43% is negative. That adds up to a mixed picture overall.

  • Delivery10× mentions

    3positive4negative

    Out of ten mentions, 35% of the feedback about Delivery comes across as positive, while 36% leans negative. That puts Delivery in a pretty mixed category.

  • Returns & refunds3× mentions

    1positive2negative

    Out of three mentions, 46% of the feedback about Returns & refunds comes across as positive, while 54% is negative. That’s a clear signal: this area keeps coming up as a source of frustration for users.

  • Packaging2× mentions

    0positive0negative

    In two instances, there’s been no positive or negative feedback about Packaging. That means the response to Packaging is evenly split, neither clearly positive nor negative.

  • Material1× mentions

    0positive1negative

    In 1 instance, all feedback about Material was negative, 0% positive, 100% negative. That’s enough to mark it as a recurring issue.

Rating trend

Rating trend: 1.6 in 2025-10 to 3.6 in 2026-09.1.52.02.53.03.54.04.52025-102026-032026-09
Rating trend: 1.6 in 2025-10 to 3.6 in 2026-09.
Data as table
Monthly average rating
MonthAvg. ratingCount
2025-101.569
2025-112.6213
2025-121.789
2026-012.119
2026-023.339
2026-032.508
2026-042.899
2026-053.7943
2026-064.2255
2026-073.7516
2026-084.1921
2026-093.638

Sentiment over time

Sentiment over time: positive share from 11% (2025-10) to 50% (2026-09).0%25%50%75%100%2025-102026-032026-09
Sentiment over time: positive share from 11% (2025-10) to 50% (2026-09).
Data as table
Monthly sentiment (shares)
MonthPositiveNeutralNegativeCount
2025-1011%0%89%9
2025-1138%0%62%13
2025-120%33%67%9
2026-0122%0%78%9
2026-0244%22%33%9
2026-0338%0%63%8
2026-0456%0%44%9
2026-0563%7%30%43
2026-0676%7%16%55
2026-0756%19%25%16
2026-0857%24%19%21
2026-0950%0%50%8

Customer voices

Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.

„It means a lot to work with a team that truly listens to customer feedback“

„She is incredibly supportive and always there to help with any questions or extra guidance we need“

„Smooth and makes requesting absences simple!“

„smoother and more useful“

„The app has gotten much better lately“

„offers solid value for money“

★★★★☆Capterra Software engineer, 51-200 employees

„I can get notifications whenever my team requests something and react right away“

„Have really been enjoying the progress on this app over the last 3 years“

What Reddit users say about Personio

Additional source: 8 Reddit discussions about Personio reviewed.

Below are extracts from Reddit discussions - each linked to the original thread.

„I really enjoyed working there though.“

„Going through their process, would love to hear from people working there how it's like lately.“

„Anyone with experience with them?“

„BambooHR tends to be the most commonly recommended Personio alternative“

Frequently asked questions

How do customers rate Personio overall?

Personio holds a 3.5-star average from 563 reviews analyzed across four review platforms.

Cite this page

Citatio (2026). Personio Reviews September 2026 – 3.5/5 from 563 reviews. Retrieved 7 September 2026 from https://citatio.ai/personio-reviews/

Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency