meteoblue: Value for money experiences
Reviewers report mixed feelings about meteoblue’s value for money, with a clear shift toward dissatisfaction over time. While some users still praise the app’s detailed forecasts, clean interface, and affordability, especially in the free version, negative feedback has grown significantly, particularly from mid-2026 onward. The overall sentiment has declined, reflected in dropping average ratings from 3.83 stars in September 2025 to 2.26 stars in June 2026. A majority of reviews, 95 out of 156, express disappointment, citing rising prices, persistent ads despite paying for premium, broken features, and a perceived drop in forecast accuracy. However, 43 positive mentions highlight that the app remains useful and well-designed for those who value depth of data and visual clarity, especially at low cost. The trend suggests that while meteoblue once offered strong value, recent changes have eroded trust and perceived fairness in pricing and service.
What customers praise
Customers who value meteoblue’s detailed weather data and clean design often highlight its strong value, especially for the price. Many note that the free version offers substantial insights, and the premium subscription remains affordable, some as low as under $1 per month. Users appreciate the app’s ability to deliver accurate forecasts, detailed radar, and informative maps, which they feel justify the cost. The app’s visual clarity and depth of information are frequently cited as reasons why it stands out compared to competitors.
What customers said:
- „you can go ad-free for nothing“
- „Have paid for full app“
- „very inexpensive less than 1 $ per month“
Common complaints
Common complaints center on rising prices, intrusive ads, and broken premium access. Users report that despite paying for a subscription, they still see ads that reappear after the app fails to recognize their paid status. Some describe full-screen, non-dismissible ads that force them to force-kill the app. Others are frustrated by the app’s recent move to lock widgets behind a paywall, which they see as a betrayal of long-term users. The perception that the app is now prioritizing revenue over user experience has led to widespread backlash.
What customers said:
- „I have a premium subscription. still I see ads.“
- „this is just after you raised the subscription fee!“
- „I have been paying for years for the ad-free version of this app“
How it has changed over time
Value perception has declined sharply since mid-2026, coinciding with a 69% price increase and a series of updates that introduced new monetization tactics. Ratings dropped from 3.83 stars in September 2025 to 2.26 stars in June 2026, with the most negative feedback concentrated in the last six months. Users note that the app’s core features, like forecast accuracy and ad-free access, have deteriorated, even as prices rose. The shift from a trusted, affordable tool to a service perceived as aggressive with ads and pricing has damaged long-term user loyalty.
What customers said:
- „Meteoblues's latest update has put their widgets behind a paywall.“
- „incredibly intrusive ads (full screen, no possibility to exit aside from force killing…“
„incredibly intrusive ads (full screen, no possibility to exit aside from force killing the app which I do)“
Practical takeaways
For users seeking detailed weather data and a clean interface, meteoblue may still offer value, especially in the free version. However, those who rely on consistent performance and ad-free access should be cautious. The app’s recent changes suggest a shift toward monetization over user satisfaction. If you’re willing to tolerate ads and frequent updates, the app may still serve well. But for those who value reliability and fairness in pricing, the current state of meteoblue may not justify the cost.
What customers said:
- „The price is really fair too.“
- „The app is very good, even the free version let's you access a lot.“
- „Great interface“
Over time
Data as table
| Month | Avg. rating | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-09 | 3.83 | 6 |
| 2025-10 | 3.67 | 3 |
| 2025-11 | 2.75 | 4 |
| 2025-12 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 2026-01 | 3.57 | 7 |
| 2026-02 | 3.50 | 6 |
| 2026-03 | 2.86 | 7 |
| 2026-04 | 2.50 | 8 |
| 2026-05 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 2026-06 | 2.26 | 23 |
| 2026-07 | 3.27 | 26 |
| 2026-08 | 3.46 | 13 |
Sentiment over time
Data as table
| Month | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 6 |
| 2025-10 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 3 |
| 2025-11 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 4 |
| 2025-12 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4 |
| 2026-01 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 7 |
| 2026-02 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 6 |
| 2026-03 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 7 |
| 2026-04 | 13% | 13% | 75% | 8 |
| 2026-05 | 25% | 8% | 67% | 12 |
| 2026-06 | 9% | 9% | 83% | 23 |
| 2026-07 | 35% | 8% | 58% | 26 |
| 2026-08 | 38% | 8% | 54% | 13 |
Customer voices
Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.
„Great value for money“
„the frequence of the ads and their click jacking became really annoying“
„good price for premium“
„doesn't work, therefore only 2 stars, because I paid the yearly fee“
„I have paid for the yearly subscription.“
„However with the increase in price of subscription I will be canceling.“
„Their first move is to increase the cost by a whopping 69% !!“
„I new this would happen as soon as "windy" took over meteoblue.“
Cite this page
Citatio (2026). meteoblue Value for money: customer reviews 2026. Retrieved 17 August 2026 from https://citatio.ai/meteoblue-reviews/value-for-money/
Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency