meteoblue Reviews & Ratings 2026
Derived from the analyzed reviews; each chip links to the page with the cited evidence.
This page is an audit of every publicly available review for meteoblue: 4,369 reviews across 3 platforms, giving you a complete, evidence-based view of meteoblue's reputation. Below you'll find the overall rating, the themes customers raise, how sentiment has trended over time, and a SWOT summary, all grounded in the reviews and linked to their sources.
Key findings
- Across 4369 reviews on 3 portals, meteoblue averages 4.0 out of 5 stars.
- Customers rate Material most positively (6 of 7 mentions positive).
- Returns & refunds draws the most criticism (18 of 18 mentions negative).
SWOT summary
Strengths
- Material: 89% positive across 7 mentions
- Quality: 56% positive across 1636 mentions
- Fit & sizing: 54% positive across 85 mentions
Weaknesses
- Returns & refunds: 100% negative across 18 mentions
- Billing & payment: 87% negative across 33 mentions
- Communication: 67% negative across 96 mentions
Opportunities
- Address returns & refunds to lift overall sentiment
- Lean on strength in material in marketing
Threats
- Ongoing criticism of returns & refunds could deter new customers
Reviews by portal
The overall 4.0 / 5 score is recency-weighted: newer reviews count more (weight 0.9 per month of age), regardless of portal.
| Portal | Avg. rating | Count | Weight | Latest | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Play | 4.1 / 5 | 4,283 | 98% | View profile ↗ | |
| Apple App Store | 4.0 / 5 | 83 | 1.9% | View profile ↗ | |
| Trustpilot | 1.0 / 5 | 3 | 0.1% | View profile ↗ | |
| Weighted overall | 4.0 / 5 | 4,369 | 100% | ||
What this analysis covers
- Google Play : 4,283 reviews
- Apple App Store : 83 reviews
- Trustpilot : 3 reviews
Period covered: Aug 2024 – Aug 2026
And what it cannot cover:
- The App Store feed caps at about 500 reviews per country storefront.
- Trustpilot exposes roughly the 200 most recent reviews publicly; older reviews sit behind a login.
Themes in the reviews
Quality1636× mentions
990positive567negativeAcross 1636 mentions, 56% of Quality feedback is positive and 39% negative. That makes Quality largely positive.
Ordering & website270× mentions
101positive137negativeAcross 270 mentions, 35% of Ordering & website feedback is positive and 54% negative. That makes Ordering & website a common pain point.
Customer service156× mentions
49positive82negativeAcross 156 mentions, 29% of Customer service feedback is positive and 55% negative. That makes Customer service a common pain point.
Value for money156× mentions
43positive95negativeAcross 156 mentions, 25% of Value for money feedback is positive and 63% negative. That makes Value for money a common pain point.
Communication96× mentions
24positive64negativeAcross 96 mentions, 24% of Communication feedback is positive and 67% negative. That makes Communication a common pain point.
Fit & sizing85× mentions
43positive32negativeAcross 85 mentions, 54% of Fit & sizing feedback is positive and 34% negative. That makes Fit & sizing largely positive.
Durability70× mentions
41positive26negativeAcross 70 mentions, 53% of Durability feedback is positive and 45% negative. That makes Durability a mixed area.
Delivery50× mentions
13positive12negativeAcross 50 mentions, 18% of Delivery feedback is positive and 23% negative. That makes Delivery a mixed area.
Billing & payment33× mentions
2positive29negativeAcross 33 mentions, 5% of Billing & payment feedback is positive and 87% negative. That makes Billing & payment a common pain point.
Returns & refunds18× mentions
0positive18negativeAcross 18 mentions, 0% of Returns & refunds feedback is positive and 100% negative. That makes Returns & refunds a common pain point.
Packaging7× mentions
0positive4negativeAcross 7 mentions, 0% of Packaging feedback is positive and 41% negative. That makes Packaging a mixed area.
Material7× mentions
6positive0negativeAcross 7 mentions, 89% of Material feedback is positive and 0% negative. That makes Material a clear strength.
Themes over time
Data as table
| Month | Quality | Ordering & website | Customer service | Value for money | Communication | Fit & sizing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06 | - | - | - | - | - | 4.0 |
| 2025-07 | - | - | - | - | - | 4.5 |
| 2025-08 | - | - | 2.7 | - | 5.0 | - |
| 2025-09 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 3.2 | - |
| 2025-10 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 2.7 |
| 2025-11 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 3.0 |
| 2025-12 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 2.0 | - | 5.0 |
| 2026-01 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 5.0 | 4.3 |
| 2026-02 | 4.2 | 2.6 | - | 3.5 | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| 2026-03 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.7 |
| 2026-04 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.2 | - |
| 2026-05 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 5.0 |
| 2026-06 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 3.1 |
| 2026-07 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 4.1 |
| 2026-08 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 4.2 |
Rating trend
Data as table
| Month | Avg. rating | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-09 | 4.31 | 155 |
| 2025-10 | 4.17 | 171 |
| 2025-11 | 4.03 | 155 |
| 2025-12 | 4.14 | 166 |
| 2026-01 | 4.26 | 230 |
| 2026-02 | 4.42 | 173 |
| 2026-03 | 4.20 | 140 |
| 2026-04 | 3.60 | 130 |
| 2026-05 | 3.94 | 257 |
| 2026-06 | 3.14 | 444 |
| 2026-07 | 4.07 | 791 |
| 2026-08 | 4.17 | 328 |
Sentiment over time
Data as table
| Month | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09 | 75% | 9% | 15% | 155 |
| 2025-10 | 74% | 9% | 17% | 171 |
| 2025-11 | 68% | 8% | 23% | 155 |
| 2025-12 | 69% | 10% | 21% | 166 |
| 2026-01 | 75% | 8% | 17% | 230 |
| 2026-02 | 77% | 9% | 14% | 173 |
| 2026-03 | 70% | 11% | 19% | 140 |
| 2026-04 | 58% | 9% | 33% | 130 |
| 2026-05 | 66% | 8% | 26% | 257 |
| 2026-06 | 36% | 12% | 52% | 444 |
| 2026-07 | 67% | 12% | 21% | 791 |
| 2026-08 | 67% | 14% | 19% | 328 |
Customer voices
Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.
„It has now become my default weather forecaster.“
„What I particularly like is the support to help understand the various symbols used.“
„help plan around the weather“
„the web page is nice“
„No reason to cater to one country at the expense of the planet“
„the date convention is American, month, day, and cannot be changed“
„Very good coverage, all around the world, strongt recomend“
„Very good Weather forecast, use this daily when I shall sailing, go fishing or other when a good forecast is beredd.“
What Reddit users say about meteoblue
Additional source: 5 Reddit discussions about meteoblue reviewed.
Below are extracts from Reddit discussions - each linked to the original thread.
„If you're looking for a weater forceast alternative, try Meteoblue !“
„meteoblue is the best in the mountains“
„Meteoblue's regional NEMS model for South America“
„MeteoBlue is gone“
„How accurate is the meteoblue model on windy.com compared to other models?“
Frequently asked questions
How do customers rate meteoblue overall?
meteoblue averages 4.0 out of 5 stars across 4369 analyzed reviews on 3 portals.
Cite this page
Citatio (2026). meteoblue Reviews 2026 – 4.0/5 from 4,369 reviews. Retrieved 17 August 2026 from https://citatio.ai/meteoblue-reviews/
Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency