meteoblue: Quality experiences
Customers have mixed views on the quality of meteoblue, with a majority expressing positive sentiment, 992 positive mentions out of 1639 total. Reviewers consistently praise the app’s detailed, accurate forecasts and clean, intuitive design, especially for outdoor activities like sailing, cycling, and hiking. However, a significant number of users report growing dissatisfaction, particularly in late 2025 and early 2026, as ratings dropped to as low as 2.78 stars in June 2026. Complaints center on intrusive advertising, declining forecast accuracy, and interface changes that disrupt usability. While some users still consider meteoblue a top-tier weather app, the overall trend shows a noticeable decline in perceived quality, especially after the introduction of new ads and layout updates. The shift from strong 5-star ratings to frequent 1- and 2-star reviews suggests a growing gap between user expectations and the current experience.
What customers praise
Many users highlight meteoblue’s strong forecasting accuracy, especially for specific locations and outdoor planning. They appreciate the detailed, hour-by-hour predictions and the app’s ability to deliver reliable data for activities like cycling in the Alps or sailing. The interface is frequently praised for being clean, easy to navigate, and visually appealing, with helpful symbol explanations that make complex weather data accessible. Several reviewers call it their go-to app and even describe it as a 'professional work of art' due to its depth and clarity.
What customers said:
- „reliable weather app with intuitive design“
- „Good and accurate weather app.“
- „EXCELLENT app for weather information!!“
Common complaints
Common complaints focus on the app’s increasing ad load, with users reporting full-screen, unskippable ads that block the interface and force them to close the app forcibly. Many describe the ads as 'extremely aggressive' and 'incredibly intrusive,' making the app nearly unusable at times. Other issues include poor visibility of weather symbols, especially for users with color vision deficiencies, and the removal of useful features like cloud coverage percentages and astronomy seeing views that were previously available on the website. Some users also report that the layout changes between locations and that widgets fail to load properly.
What customers said:
- „There's no cloud coverage percentage that's present on the meteoblue website Astronomy…“
„There's no cloud coverage percentage that's present on the meteoblue website Astronomy page.“
- „no astronomy seeing view while this is on the website“
- „the forcast is wrong 80% of the time“
How it has changed over time
The quality perception of meteoblue has declined sharply since mid-2025. Ratings were above 4 stars in September and October 2025 but dropped to 3.44 in November and fell further to 2.78 in June 2026, the lowest point in the data. This coincides with user reports of new ad placements, interface changes, and reduced forecast accuracy. While the app regained some ground in August 2026 with a 3.93-star rating, the overall trend shows a clear deterioration in user satisfaction, especially after the introduction of aggressive monetization tactics and design updates that many feel have compromised usability.
What customers said:
- „Even with full accuracy and 0% chance of rain, you look outside and it may be an downpour“
- „New temperature colours are awful for poor vision, no distinction between them“
- „the temperature colors are samey and hard to differentiate“
Practical takeaways
For users seeking accurate, detailed weather data with a clean interface, meteoblue remains a strong option, especially for outdoor enthusiasts and professionals who need precise forecasts. However, those sensitive to ads or relying on consistent feature availability may find the current version frustrating. The app’s value depends heavily on whether users prioritize forecast quality over ad frequency and interface stability. If the current trend continues, users may need to weigh the benefits of detailed data against the growing annoyance of intrusive ads and inconsistent performance.
What customers said:
- „easy does what is needs to do“
- „work perfect on my HONOR Magic6 PRO!“
- „meteoblue is one of the best and most reliable weather services that I've come across“
Over time
Data as table
| Month | Avg. rating | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-09 | 4.30 | 54 |
| 2025-10 | 3.96 | 72 |
| 2025-11 | 3.44 | 62 |
| 2025-12 | 3.82 | 65 |
| 2026-01 | 3.93 | 98 |
| 2026-02 | 4.19 | 53 |
| 2026-03 | 3.89 | 45 |
| 2026-04 | 3.16 | 32 |
| 2026-05 | 3.50 | 94 |
| 2026-06 | 2.78 | 213 |
| 2026-07 | 3.75 | 288 |
| 2026-08 | 3.93 | 121 |
Sentiment over time
Data as table
| Month | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09 | 80% | 4% | 17% | 54 |
| 2025-10 | 72% | 6% | 22% | 72 |
| 2025-11 | 58% | 2% | 40% | 62 |
| 2025-12 | 65% | 5% | 31% | 65 |
| 2026-01 | 68% | 4% | 28% | 98 |
| 2026-02 | 70% | 4% | 26% | 53 |
| 2026-03 | 67% | 9% | 24% | 45 |
| 2026-04 | 47% | 6% | 47% | 32 |
| 2026-05 | 52% | 1% | 47% | 94 |
| 2026-06 | 25% | 6% | 69% | 213 |
| 2026-07 | 62% | 5% | 33% | 288 |
| 2026-08 | 64% | 7% | 29% | 121 |
Customer voices
Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.
„The weather information this app provides is laid out in an easy and attractive design.“
„the adverts are longer and more frequent“
„it's almost unusable“
„Very easy to navigate.“
„Reports weather for very tight area and always reliable“
„my ‘go to’ weather app for cycling in the French Alps 😁“
„Meteoblue is the most informative, easy to navigate and accurate app“
„It predicts the weather hour by hour in a reliable manner!“
What Reddit users discuss
Below are extracts from Reddit which discuss quality in more detail - each linked to the original thread.
„meteoblue is the best in the mountains“
„It seems to handle terrain and orographic effects better than the usual global models I rely“
Cite this page
Citatio (2026). meteoblue Quality: customer reviews 2026. Retrieved 17 August 2026 from https://citatio.ai/meteoblue-reviews/quality/
Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency