1.7 / 5 Last 12 months (71 reviews) Plain average of all reviews from the last 12 months. All-time rating (recency-weighted, 0.9^months): 2.0 / 5. All-time: 2.0 / 5 · 124 reviews (-0.3 vs all-time)
5★ 28
4★ 6
3★ 12
2★ 21
1★ 57
124 Reviews
1 Sources
2% Positive
What reviewers criticize most

Derived from the analyzed reviews; each chip links to the page with the cited evidence.

This page analyzes 124 publicly available reviews of jobs.ch from 1 platform, providing a complete, evidence-based view of its reputation. The overall rating is based on these reviews. Key themes from customer feedback are identified. Sentiment trends over time are tracked. A SWOT summary is included, all derived directly from the reviews and linked to their sources.

Key findings

  • Jobs.ch has a 2.0 out of 5 stars rating from 124 reviews on one portal.
  • Customers most positively rate ordering and the website, with 5 out of 43 mentions being positive.
  • Customer service received 10 negative mentions out of 10 total mentions.

What changed in August 2026

In August 2026, 3 new reviews were analyzed; the average rating moved from 1.3 to 1.7 stars.

New reviews
3
Average rating
1.7/5 (1.3 ↑)
Positive share
0%

Most-discussed themes

  • Ordering & website — unchanged
  • Customer service — +2 vs prior month
  • Communication — unchanged
  • Fit & sizing — +1 vs prior month
  • Quality — -1 vs prior month

SWOT summary

Strengths

  • Solid overall rating

Weaknesses

  • Customer service: 100% negative across 10 mentions
  • Communication: 100% negative across 7 mentions
  • Quality: 98% negative across 39 mentions

Opportunities

  • Address customer service to lift overall sentiment
  • Lean on strength in core themes in marketing

Threats

  • Ongoing criticism of customer service could deter new customers

Reviews by portal

The overall 2.0 / 5 score is recency-weighted: newer reviews count more (weight 0.9 per month of age), regardless of portal.

jobs.ch: reviews per portal
Portal Avg. rating Count Weight Latest Source
Google Play 2.4 / 5 124 100% View profile ↗
Weighted overall 2.0 / 5 124 100%
What this analysis covers

Period covered: Sept 2024 – Sept 2026

Read the full methodology

Themes in the reviews

  • Ordering & website43× mentions

    5positive36negative

    Ordering & website has 5% positive feedback and 94% negative feedback across 43 mentions. This makes Ordering & website a common pain point.

  • Quality39× mentions

    1positive37negative

    Quality has 39 mentions, with 1% positive feedback and 98% negative feedback, making it a common pain point.

  • Customer service10× mentions

    0positive10negative

    Customer service has 0% positive feedback and 100% negative feedback across 10 mentions. Customer service is a common pain point.

  • Communication7× mentions

    0positive7negative

    Communication has 7 mentions with 0% positive feedback and 100% negative feedback, making it a common pain point.

  • Fit & sizing4× mentions

    0positive4negative

    Fit & sizing has 0% positive feedback across 4 mentions and 100% negative feedback, making it a common pain point.

  • Durability2× mentions

    0positive2negative

    In two instances, none of the feedback about Durability came through as positive, every single comment was negative. That adds up to a clear pattern: Durability keeps coming up as a problem.

  • Delivery2× mentions

    0positive2negative

    Delivery has a 0% positive feedback rate and 100% negative feedback across 2 mentions. Delivery is a common pain point.

  • Material1× mentions

    0positive1negative

    In 1 instance, all feedback about Material was negative, 0% positive, 100% negative. That’s enough to mark it as a recurring issue.

Rating trend

Rating trend: 2.5 in 2025-10 to 3.5 in 2026-09.1.01.52.02.53.03.52025-102026-032026-09
Rating trend: 2.5 in 2025-10 to 3.5 in 2026-09.
Data as table
Monthly average rating
MonthAvg. ratingCount
2025-102.502
2025-112.673
2025-121.4715
2026-011.569
2026-022.005
2026-031.2516
2026-042.605
2026-051.504
2026-061.333
2026-071.254
2026-081.673
2026-093.502

Sentiment over time

Sentiment over time: positive share from 50% (2025-10) to 50% (2026-09).0%25%50%75%100%2025-102026-032026-09
Sentiment over time: positive share from 50% (2025-10) to 50% (2026-09).
Data as table
Monthly sentiment (shares)
MonthPositiveNeutralNegativeCount
2025-1050%0%50%2
2025-1133%0%67%3
2025-120%7%93%15
2026-010%11%89%9
2026-020%0%100%5
2026-036%0%94%16
2026-0420%0%80%5
2026-050%0%100%4
2026-060%33%67%3
2026-070%0%100%4
2026-080%0%100%3
2026-0950%0%50%2

Customer voices

Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.

„There is no way to change the app language from English to German.“

★★☆☆☆Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„Es gibt keine Möglichkeit, die Appsprache von Englisch auf Deutsch zu ändern.“

„Keep getting logged out“

„The app logs itself out.“

★★☆☆☆Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„die app meldet sich von selber ab“

„Why a cover letter is even needed in 2026.“

★★☆☆☆Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„warum es überhaupt 2026 ein Motivationsschreiben braucht.“

„It opens something completely different where neither the location nor the job matches.“

★☆☆☆☆Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„es öffnet sich ein ganz anderes wo weder ort noch job passen“

„The idea of including an AI tool to create a cover letter is actually quite good.“

★★☆☆☆Google PlayTranslated· GermanOriginal
„Die Idee ein KI Tool einzubauen, um ein Motivationsschreiben zu erstellen ist ja ganz gut.“

„What a joy to see this ☺️“

★☆☆☆☆Google PlayTranslated· SpanishOriginal
„que alegría ver esto ☺️“

„Is Spanish not available in the app?“

★☆☆☆☆Google PlayTranslated· SpanishOriginal
„el español no existe en la app?“

Frequently asked questions

How do customers rate jobs.ch overall?

jobs.ch has a 2.0 out of 5 stars rating based on 124 reviews from 1 portal.

Cite this page

Citatio (2026). jobs.ch Reviews September 2026 – 2.0/5 from 124 reviews. Retrieved 19 September 2026 from https://citatio.ai/jobs-ch-reviews/

Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency