How is the fit & sizing of Infomaniak?
Infomaniak's mobile and tablet apps receive mixed reviews, with 26 positive and 14 negative mentions. Users praise simplicity, speed, and intuitive design, especially for email and file transfer. Usability issues persist on mobile, particularly in file management and calendar access. Overall sentiment improved from early 2025, peaking at 4.8 stars in February 2026. A drop to 2 stars occurred in August 2026 due to a surge in criticism. Despite setbacks, most users find core services functional and well-designed. Mobile ergonomics and feature parity across platforms remain ongoing challenges.
What customers praise
Customers frequently praise Infomaniak’s apps for being simple, fast, and intuitive. The apps have a clean interface and reliable performance, especially in email and file transfer. Users value the absence of unnecessary features and the smooth integration into daily workflows. Infomaniak’s apps are powerful, responsive, and easy to use across devices.
What customers said:
- „Very convenient availability“
„Very convenient availability“
Original„dispo très confortable“
- „The system integrates perfectly into my workflow.“
„The system integrates perfectly into my workflow.“
Original„Das System integriert sich perfekt in mein Workflow“
- „Very powerful and simple to use“
Common complaints
Mobile and tablet users report frequent crashes, poor layout, and inconsistent behavior. Files sometimes revert to original folders. Text sizes can be unreadable. Key features like a calendar are missing. The interface on smartphones and tablets is confusing and not user-friendly. Some users describe it as a 'catastrophe.' Problems are especially common on Android and Mac devices.
What customers said:
- „It is still missing at least a "shared with me" folder.“
„It is still missing at least a "shared with me" folder.“
Original„Il manque toujours au moins un dossier "partages avec moi".“
- „Users must synchronize between the office (Outlook) and their mobile or home devices.“
„Users must synchronize between the office (Outlook) and their mobile or home devices.“
Original„les usagers doivent nécessairement synchroniser entre le bureau (Outlook) et leur mobile ou domicile.“
- „The font size is super small.“
„The font size is super small.“
Original„el tamaño de la letra es súper pequeño“
How it has changed over time
User sentiment improved over time, with early 2025 reviews averaging 3.5 stars. By February 2026, ratings rose to 4.8 stars. A drop to 2 stars occurred in August 2026, indicating a recent spike in negative feedback. This decline likely stems from unresolved mobile issues. Despite this, the overall trend shows progress, with more users reporting positive experiences in recent months. Development continues, and users are adapting, though core problems remain unresolved.
What customers said:
- „You cannot hide photos or videos in the gallery.“
„You cannot hide photos or videos in the gallery.“
Original„On ne peut pas cacher des photos ou vidéos dans la gallerie.“
- „Doesn't work on PC (very poorly).“
„Doesn't work on PC (very poorly).“
Original„Ne fonctionne pas sur pc (très mal)“
- „listing .dwg files and others in the gallery when they are not viewable in thumbnails“
„listing .dwg files and others in the gallery when they are not viewable in thumbnails“
Original„listarem arquivos .dwg entre outros na galeria quando não são visualizaveis nas miniaturas“
Practical takeaways
Infomaniak offers strong privacy and performance for email and file transfer. It lacks a calendar and has poor file management on mobile devices. Stability and usability are inconsistent on Android and Mac. Users should expect occasional technical friction. The platform is best for those prioritizing data protection and ethical design over mobile convenience.
What customers said:
- „The display is tiny; it's impossible to view without downloading the attachment.“
„The display is tiny; it's impossible to view without downloading the attachment.“
Original„l’affichage est tout petit, impossible de consulter sans downloader la pièce jointe“
- „Alphabetical sorting is very inconsistent.“
„Alphabetical sorting is very inconsistent.“
Original„classement alphabétique très aléatoire“
- „More comfortable and with more capacity than the competition.“
„More comfortable and with more capacity than the competition.“
Original„Más comoda y con más capacidad que la competencia“
Over time
Data as table
| Month | Avg. rating | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-09 | 3.50 | 2 |
| 2025-10 | 5.00 | 3 |
| 2025-11 | 5.00 | 2 |
| 2025-12 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 2026-01 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 2026-02 | 4.80 | 5 |
| 2026-03 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 2026-04 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 2026-05 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 2026-06 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 2026-07 | 3.50 | 4 |
| 2026-08 | 2.00 | 1 |
Sentiment over time
Data as table
| Month | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2 |
| 2025-10 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 2025-11 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2 |
| 2025-12 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2 |
| 2026-01 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2 |
| 2026-02 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 5 |
| 2026-03 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 6 |
| 2026-04 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2 |
| 2026-05 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2 |
| 2026-06 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 2026-07 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 4 |
| 2026-08 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Customer voices
Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.
„It displays, but forgets the email subject and the link in the body text.“
„Using a spreadsheet or text document is a real headache.“
„It's just fun to use.“
„Simple to use.“
„not usable on GrapheneOS“
„No calendar on the smartphone!“
„The ergonomics are not natural on this platform“
„suits me perfectly“
Cite this page
Citatio (2026). Infomaniak Fit & sizing: customer reviews September 2026. Retrieved 18 August 2026 from https://citatio.ai/infomaniak-reviews/fit-sizing/
Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency