Quote verification
This proves the quote below is recorded by Citatio exactly as displayed and has not been altered since it was committed and anchored. It documents Citatio's crawl observation; it does not imply endorsement by the source platform. The quote links to the original review.
“I believe it is unreasonable to charge customers for a subscription when access is contingent on an approval process that is ultimately denied.”
Checks (re-run on this request)
- ✓ Signature — Ed25519 signature over the record hash, verified against the public key at /.well-known/citatio-signing.json
- ✓ Merkle inclusion — Leaf recomputed through the sibling path to the anchored root
- ✓ Public transparency log — Sigstore Rekor log index 2789279696
Proof data
- Record hash (SHA-256)
30b3acf4dcb491f0be9055ec1689e661717b28856c592ca8536323f96b040a10- Signature (Ed25519, base64)
zJa+B9WCKfcu8MpSvGW9Df7+4g/Li1uUA4fkYBLrgWJGJXzqmf8de0TkCLw+7jaFBbJ+dWnThLKdOUZhbXn+Dg==- Merkle root
97eb1062a862b99998bef0a84476eb3c3812bb77c2cb927f4fd2933b59da9e3d- Merkle path
["30b3b784e5af524938c38d1f2c53aaebebc0459ab847914571e5d989c4700a05","690364e97fc654af83c66e03da8bc7da85f4d42d692b34bb30bd2f30de65e3d1","e963b3d098f0ec6e2d7cbdc5afcd7a9739a679407fb2188bb59ffbb613bd7827","5e29a1b217dd8c2f601a4d008e455a8668df4153c69281c85a705852305cbe71","9afebd95d4d609f262491fcc6fa4a2693635fe106943bf2192a2a6908a51189f","8dec7665ffdc45ab4ff0227c8a792cebfe0276573ef8a4bfa386ebf3c163bdb4","dcad35596c130051e2b886727b2ddcf54d0db5ae26a31191937f16d2d2fa610d","607866c2afb41d3301d26fdd0011541a648cdba7ec408c70ef01f983f129ffb3","8725540a216918e30d00694df0bda7ffb89dfa5896c8a7212803e7e764e99aa5","4891d737a9f38d4a4a07c06ce912680920ff9d5517eea6b888bb67e89f57d2d4","5553ed2457f1c23af88ee778f913c101570661a707416f00741f020e76998f21","c3f635ba717eeeb5ba2ef9ddb3d4150c23b49c53fc05a76fef371e9ad8330b6f","b2cde2091952330dc6d7773f9467df58d2e8463851174cad44d4f743c8f8617f","a9559f2ca8536f2c18bf059f3f0099d62235a93ac35dc17b09967d392b72be7f","01242865574478f13dcf9d888236d7a907264abdb87f360db7db06de0945075a"]- Anchored
- 2026-09-11
- Public log entry
-
search.sigstore.dev, log index 2789279696 · entry
108e9186e8c5677a3885… - Expected log hash
-
05c7009ecf7ce5cf315c252c2a1dd135e64989a02cacdaaa3c5a87412a2e921cThe log entry'sspec.data.hash.valuemust equal this value: the SHA-256 of the Merkle root string above. Recompute it yourself from the root to confirm. - Canonical record
{"dataset_version":"v1789017464005","kind":"published-quote","locale":"en","page":"brand:wave","quote":"I believe it is unreasonable to charge customers for a subscription when access is contingent on an approval process that is ultimately denied.","rating":1,"review_date":"2026-09-03","source":"Trustpilot","source_url":"https://www.trustpilot.com/reviews/6a994257375d8c3e109859b1","v":1}
Verify in the public log
- Open the Rekor entry (pre-filled with this proof's log index).
-
In the entry, compare
spec.data.hash.valuewith the "Expected log hash" above: it is the SHA-256 of the Merkle root string (97eb1062a862…), which ties this proof's root to the log entry. -
Decode
spec.signature.publicKey.contentfrom base64: it must equal Citatio's published key at /.well-known/citatio-signing.json. -
The entry's
integratedTimeis the independent timestamp: the root, and with it this quote, existed no later than that moment. - Locally, without any Citatio infrastructure: SHA-256 the canonical record (must equal the record hash), verify the Ed25519 signature against the public key, and fold the hash through the Merkle path (sorted-pair SHA-256) to reach the anchored root.