Thermo Fisher Scientific Reviews & Ratings 2026
- Quality(49)
- Durability(15)
- Customer service(10)
- Fit & sizing(10)
- Value for money(9)
Derived from the analyzed reviews; each chip links to the page with the cited evidence.
This page is an audit of every publicly available review for Thermo Fisher Scientific: 2,045 reviews across 1 platforms, giving you a complete, evidence-based view of Thermo Fisher Scientific's reputation. Below you'll find the overall rating, the themes customers raise, how sentiment has trended over time, and a SWOT summary, all grounded in the reviews and linked to their sources.
Key findings
- Across 2045 reviews on 1 portal, Thermo Fisher Scientific averages 4.7 out of 5 stars.
- Customers rate Fit & sizing most positively (10 of 10 mentions positive).
- Customer service draws the most criticism (2 of 16 mentions negative).
SWOT summary
Strengths
- Fit & sizing: 100% positive across 10 mentions
- Quality: 96% positive across 51 mentions
- Durability: 91% positive across 17 mentions
Weaknesses
- No pronounced weaknesses
Opportunities
- Highlight positive themes in marketing
Threats
- Competitive pressure on price and service
Reviews by portal
The overall 4.7 / 5 score is recency-weighted: newer reviews count more (weight 0.9 per month of age), regardless of portal.
| Portal | Avg. rating | Count | Weight | Latest | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SelectScience | 4.5 / 5 | 2,045 | 100% | View profile ↗ | |
| Weighted overall | 4.7 / 5 | 2,045 | 100% | ||
What this analysis covers
Themes in the reviews
Quality51× mentions
49positive1negativeAcross 51 mentions, 96% of Quality feedback is positive and 1% negative. That makes Quality a clear strength.
Durability17× mentions
15positive2negativeAcross 17 mentions, 91% of Durability feedback is positive and 9% negative. That makes Durability a clear strength.
Customer service16× mentions
10positive2negativeAcross 16 mentions, 77% of Customer service feedback is positive and 10% negative. That makes Customer service a clear strength.
Value for money13× mentions
9positive1negativeAcross 13 mentions, 77% of Value for money feedback is positive and 6% negative. That makes Value for money a clear strength.
Fit & sizing10× mentions
10positive0negativeAcross 10 mentions, 100% of Fit & sizing feedback is positive and 0% negative. That makes Fit & sizing a clear strength.
Delivery5× mentions
2positive0negativeAcross 5 mentions, 64% of Delivery feedback is positive and 0% negative. That makes Delivery largely positive.
Ordering & website3× mentions
3positive0negativeAcross 3 mentions, 100% of Ordering & website feedback is positive and 0% negative. That makes Ordering & website a clear strength.
Material1× mentions
1positive0negativeAcross 1 mentions, 100% of Material feedback is positive and 0% negative. That makes Material a clear strength.
Communication1× mentions
1positive0negativeAcross 1 mentions, 100% of Communication feedback is positive and 0% negative. That makes Communication a clear strength.
Themes over time
Data as table
| Month | Quality | Durability | Customer service | Value for money | Fit & sizing | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09 | - | - | 4.0 | - | - | - |
| 2024-10 | - | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | - |
| 2024-12 | - | - | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | 5.0 |
| 2025-01 | - | 4.0 | - | 4.5 | - | - |
| 2025-02 | - | - | 4.0 | 4.0 | - | 4.0 |
| 2025-03 | - | 4.0 | - | 4.0 | 4.0 | - |
| 2025-04 | 4.5 | 4.0 | - | - | - | - |
| 2025-05 | 3.5 | 3.5 | - | 2.0 | 5.0 | - |
| 2025-07 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | - |
| 2025-08 | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2025-09 | 5.0 | - | 5.0 | - | - | - |
| 2025-10 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 2025-11 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | 5.0 | - |
| 2025-12 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.0 | - | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 2026-01 | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2026-02 | 3.0 | - | 3.0 | - | - | - |
| 2026-03 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - |
| 2026-04 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Rating trend
Data as table
| Month | Avg. rating | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-04 | 4.75 | 4 |
| 2025-05 | 3.50 | 2 |
| 2025-07 | 4.50 | 4 |
| 2025-08 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 2025-09 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 2025-10 | 4.20 | 5 |
| 2025-11 | 4.86 | 7 |
| 2025-12 | 4.83 | 6 |
| 2026-01 | 5.00 | 2 |
| 2026-02 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 2026-03 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 2026-04 | 5.00 | 7 |
Sentiment over time
Data as table
| Month | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 2025-05 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2 |
| 2025-07 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 4 |
| 2025-08 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 2025-09 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 2025-10 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 2025-11 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 2025-12 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 2026-01 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 2026-02 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 1 |
| 2026-03 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 2026-04 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
Customer voices
Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.
„It handles high-plex imaging in a single run, which makes a noticeable difference in how fast we can generate useful spatial data.“
„The EVOS S1000 makes multiplex imaging feel accessible and the software is very intuitive, even for more complex workflows.“
„Intuitive, fast imaging with clean signals, enabling biology-focused analysis.“
„fast scanning and incredible potential for the future“
„Extremely easy to use, great sensitivity allowing for multicolor panels based on primary conjugated antibodies“
„Especially with DIA.“
„We have been using our Orbitrap Lumos for the past 6 years and we have accumulated amazing results still.“
„The S1000 is a fast, reliable, and user-friendly instrument“
Frequently asked questions
How do customers rate Thermo Fisher Scientific overall?
Thermo Fisher Scientific averages 4.7 out of 5 stars across 2045 analyzed reviews on 1 portals.
Cite this page
Citatio (2026). Thermo Fisher Scientific Reviews 2026 – 4.7/5 from 2,045 reviews. Retrieved 30 August 2026 from https://citatio.ai/thermofisher-reviews/
Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency