3.1 / 5 Last 12 months (801 reviews) Plain average of all reviews from the last 12 months. All-time rating (recency-weighted, 0.9^months): 3.0 / 5. All-time: 3.0 / 5 · 1,742 reviews (+0.1 vs all-time)
5★ 720
4★ 88
3★ 48
2★ 38
1★ 848
1,742 Reviews
4 Sources
26% Positive
What reviewers praise most
  • Fit & sizing(8)
What reviewers criticize most
  • Value for money(209)
  • Billing & payment(206)
  • Ordering & website(195)
  • Quality(99)
  • Customer service(79)

Derived from the analyzed reviews; each chip links to the page with the cited evidence.

This page pulls together every public review of pdfFiller that’s available, 1,742 in total, spread across four platforms, giving you a full, real-world picture of how people actually feel about the service. No spin, no summaries that skip the gritty details. Just the facts, stitched together from the actual feedback. You’ll see the overall score, the main topics customers keep bringing up, how opinions have shifted over the years, and a concise SWOT analysis, all drawn straight from the reviews, with each point tied to its source.

Key findings

  • In a survey of 1,742 reviews across four different platforms, pdfFiller holds an average rating of 3.0 stars out of 5.
  • Customers tend to like the fit and sizing the most, eight out of every ten mentions point to something positive in that area.
  • Billing and payment get the brunt of the complaints, cited in 206 out of 209 negative mentions.

What changed in August 2026

In August 2026, 87 new reviews were analyzed; the average rating held at 3.3 stars.

New reviews
87
Average rating
3.3/5
Positive share
52% (54% ↓)

Most-discussed themes

  • Quality — +9 vs prior month
  • Value for money — +3 vs prior month
  • Customer service — -3 vs prior month
  • Billing & payment — -7 vs prior month
  • Ordering & website — -15 vs prior month

What AI assistants say about pdfFiller

Neutral AI sentiment
0.3% Mentioned in AI answers
0.2% Share of voice

based on 17 analysed AI answers

🔒 Full AI-visibility report for pdfFiller Per-theme accuracy vs reviews, citation gaps, competitor share-of-voice and recommendations.
Schedule a call

Our analysis of AI-assistant output — not the assistants’ raw text.

SWOT summary

Strengths

  • Fit & sizing: 81% positive across 10 mentions
  • Durability: 66% positive across 9 mentions
  • Quality: 63% positive across 252 mentions

Weaknesses

  • Billing & payment: 98% negative across 209 mentions
  • Communication: 92% negative across 47 mentions
  • Value for money: 89% negative across 241 mentions

Opportunities

  • Address billing & payment to lift overall sentiment
  • Lean on strength in fit & sizing in marketing

Threats

  • Ongoing criticism of billing & payment could deter new customers

Reviews by portal

The overall 3.0 / 5 score is recency-weighted: newer reviews count more (weight 0.9 per month of age), regardless of portal.

pdfFiller: reviews per portal
Portal Avg. rating Count Weight Latest Source
Google Play 2.8 / 5 1,107 63.5% View profile ↗
Trustpilot 3.6 / 5 308 17.7% View profile ↗
Apple App Store 1.5 / 5 216 12.4% View profile ↗
Capterra 4.7 / 5 111 6.4% View profile ↗
Weighted overall 3.0 / 5 1,742 100%
What this analysis covers

Period covered: Aug 2024 – Sept 2026

And what it cannot cover:

  • Trustpilot exposes roughly the 200 most recent reviews publicly; older reviews sit behind a login.
  • The App Store feed caps at about 500 reviews per country storefront.

Read the full methodology

Themes in the reviews

  • Ordering & website255× mentions

    52positive195negative

    Out of 255 mentions, just 23% were positive when it came to Ordering & website feedback, while a clear majority, 74%, were negative. This imbalance highlights Ordering & website as a recurring issue for users.

  • Quality252× mentions

    150positive99negative

    Out of 252 mentions, 63% reflect positive feedback about Quality, while 37% are negative. Overall, Quality comes across as mostly positive.

  • Value for money241× mentions

    30positive209negative

    Out of 241 mentions, just 9% of feedback about Value for money comes across as positive, while a clear 89% is negative. That’s a strong signal: people keep running into problems here, making it a frequent source of frustration.

  • Billing & payment209× mentions

    3positive206negative

    Out of 209 mentions, just 2% of feedback about Billing & payment comes across positively, 98% is negative. It’s a recurring issue that customers consistently bring up.

  • Customer service139× mentions

    57positive79negative

    Out of 139 mentions, customer service drew 43% positive feedback and 55% negative, making it a frequent source of frustration for users.

  • Returns & refunds57× mentions

    7positive49negative

    In 57 instances, just 10% of the feedback about Returns & refunds came across as positive, while nearly nine out of every ten comments were negative. This shows it's a recurring issue that customers frequently struggle with.

  • Communication47× mentions

    3positive43negative

    In 47 instances, only 5% of feedback about Communication was positive, while 92% was negative, making it a recurring issue.

  • Delivery13× mentions

    5positive6negative

    Out of 13 mentions, 34% of the feedback about Delivery comes across as positive, while 54% leans negative. That adds up to a recurring issue, Delivery keeps showing up as a source of frustration.

  • Fit & sizing10× mentions

    8positive1negative

    Out of ten instances, 81% of the feedback about Fit & sizing comes back positive, with only 2% leaning negative. That’s a solid signal, Fit & sizing is clearly doing well.

  • Durability9× mentions

    5positive4negative

    In nine instances, 66% of the feedback about Durability comes across as positive, while 34% is negative, so overall, the sentiment leans strongly in the positive direction.

Rating trend

Rating trend: 2.9 in 2025-10 to 3.4 in 2026-09.2.02.53.03.52025-102026-032026-09
Rating trend: 2.9 in 2025-10 to 3.4 in 2026-09.
Data as table
Monthly average rating
MonthAvg. ratingCount
2025-102.9469
2025-113.0648
2025-122.3735
2026-012.9340
2026-022.6348
2026-032.6144
2026-043.1241
2026-053.0876
2026-063.42127
2026-073.29121
2026-083.2687
2026-093.4224

Sentiment over time

Sentiment over time: positive share from 48% (2025-10) to 58% (2026-09).0%25%50%75%100%2025-102026-032026-09
Sentiment over time: positive share from 48% (2025-10) to 58% (2026-09).
Data as table
Monthly sentiment (shares)
MonthPositiveNeutralNegativeCount
2025-1048%1%51%69
2025-1146%6%48%48
2025-1231%3%66%35
2026-0140%8%53%40
2026-0235%4%60%48
2026-0336%7%57%44
2026-0449%2%49%41
2026-0547%3%50%76
2026-0659%2%39%127
2026-0754%4%42%121
2026-0852%5%44%87
2026-0958%0%42%24

Customer voices

Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.

„After repeating "I did not sign up for an annual subscription. I expect a full refund." about 5 times, it did confirm it processed a full refund.“

„it tried saying it couldn't offer me a full refund.“

„I used it once, canceled immediately after use and it charged me for annual subscription a month later.“

„I was able to use this software to edit the pdf's to make his compliant with the city of Austin,Tx.“

„Not being upfront is scammy“

„you have to create an account and sign up to pay for a membership or lose all progress“

„They let you access everything for free initially“

„I paid for the app, but I wasn’t able to finish my work because the app crashed.“

What Reddit users say about pdfFiller

Additional source: 4 Reddit discussions about pdfFiller reviewed.

Below are extracts from Reddit discussions - each linked to the original thread.

„it always makes me sign into pdf filler and then try to charge me“

„PDFfillers plan was to make me work hard on a document“

„required just to save it“

Frequently asked questions

How do customers rate pdfFiller overall?

PdfFiller holds a 3.0 average rating from 1,742 reviews collected across four different platforms.

Cite this page

Citatio (2026). pdfFiller Reviews September 2026 – 3.0/5 from 1,742 reviews. Retrieved 7 September 2026 from https://citatio.ai/pdffiller-reviews/

Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency