Thermo Fisher Scientific Reviews & Ratings October 2026
Thermo Fisher Scientific reviews: the verdict
Reviewers report that Thermo Fisher Scientific maintains a strong reputation with a 4.7 out of 5 rating across 2,045 reviews on one portal, consistent with a 4.7 rating from 29 recent reviews over the last 12 months. Customers describe the brand’s products as high quality, with 49 mentions of quality in reviews, 96% of which are positive. The reliability and precision of equipment are frequently highlighted, especially in laboratory and research settings. A recurring criticism notes that customer service response times can be slow, particularly for technical support inquiries.
Key findings
- Across 2,045 reviews on 1 portal, the recency-weighted average is 4.7 out of 5.
- The last 12 months average 4.7 out of 5 from 29 reviews.
- Quality(47)
- Durability(15)
- Customer service(10)
- Fit & sizing(10)
- Value for money(9)
Derived from the analyzed reviews; each chip links to the page with the cited evidence.
2,045 reviews · 1 portals · 2005-03 – 2026-04 · Methodology ↗ · Verify a quote ↗
Thermo Fisher Scientific rating trend and sentiment
Months with fewer than 5 rated reviews are left out.
Data as table
| Month | Avg. rating | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-04 | 4.75 | 4 |
| 2025-05 | 3.50 | 2 |
| 2025-07 | 4.50 | 4 |
| 2025-08 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 2025-09 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 2025-10 | 4.20 | 5 |
| 2025-11 | 4.86 | 7 |
| 2025-12 | 4.83 | 6 |
| 2026-01 | 5.00 | 2 |
| 2026-02 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 2026-03 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 2026-04 | 5.00 | 7 |
Data as table
| Month | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 2025-05 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2 |
| 2025-07 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 4 |
| 2025-08 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 2025-09 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 2025-10 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 2025-11 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 2025-12 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 2026-01 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 2026-02 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 1 |
| 2026-03 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 2026-04 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
Themes over time
Data as table
| Month | Quality | Durability | Customer service | Value for money | Fit & sizing | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09 | - | - | 4.0 | - | - | - |
| 2024-10 | - | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | - |
| 2024-12 | - | - | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | 5.0 |
| 2025-01 | - | 4.0 | - | 4.5 | - | - |
| 2025-02 | - | - | 4.0 | 4.0 | - | 4.0 |
| 2025-03 | - | 4.0 | - | 4.0 | 4.0 | - |
| 2025-04 | 4.5 | 4.0 | - | - | - | - |
| 2025-05 | 3.5 | 3.5 | - | 2.0 | 5.0 | - |
| 2025-07 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | - |
| 2025-08 | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2025-09 | 5.0 | - | 5.0 | - | - | - |
| 2025-10 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 2025-11 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | 5.0 | - |
| 2025-12 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.0 | - | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 2026-01 | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2026-02 | 3.0 | - | 3.0 | - | - | - |
| 2026-03 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - |
| 2026-04 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Latest Thermo Fisher Scientific customer voices
The most recent review passages across all portals. Each quote links to its source.
Short excerpts - full reviews are available at the original source.
„It handles high-plex imaging in a single run, which makes a noticeable difference in how fast we can generate useful spatial data.“
„The EVOS S1000 makes multiplex imaging feel accessible and the software is very intuitive, even for more complex workflows.“
„Intuitive, fast imaging with clean signals, enabling biology-focused analysis.“
„fast scanning and incredible potential for the future“
„Extremely easy to use, great sensitivity allowing for multicolor panels based on primary conjugated antibodies“
„Especially with DIA.“
What Reddit users say about Thermo Fisher Scientific
From 2 Reddit threads that mention Thermo Fisher Scientific. Community posts are opinions, not verified purchases.
Below are extracts from Reddit discussions - each linked to the original thread.
„So far, I've been working here for almost 4 months, and you won't lack training.“
„sobrang worth it ang company na to“
Thermo Fisher Scientific review themes at a glance
Every theme is backed by classified review text. Open a theme to read its analysis.
Quality49× mentions
47positive1negativeDurability17× mentions
15positive2negativeCustomer service15× mentions
10positive1negativeValue for money13× mentions
9positive1negativeFit & sizing10× mentions
10positive0negativeDelivery5× mentions
2positive0negativeOrdering & website3× mentions
3positive0negativeMaterial1× mentions
1positive0negativeCommunication1× mentions
1positive0negative
Thermo Fisher Scientific review sources, coverage and method
The overall 4.7 / 5 score is recency-weighted: newer reviews count more (weight 0.9 per month of age), regardless of portal.
| Portal | Avg. rating | Count | Weight | Latest | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SelectScience | 4.5 / 5 | 2,045 | 100% | View profile ↗ | |
| Weighted overall | 4.7 / 5 | 2,045 | 100% | ||
Period covered: 2005-03 – 2026-04. Reviews older than 24 months stay in the trend charts but no longer feed the headline figures.
What this analysis cannot cover
- Only publicly visible reviews are included; nothing behind a login, and no reviews submitted to us directly.
- Sentiment is classified from the review text, never from the star rating. Unclassified reviews count toward totals but not toward sentiment shares.
What this analysis covers
How the numbers are made
Every review is read once by a language model that labels its themes and sentiment and picks short verbatim passages. Recent reviews weigh more than old ones (each month of age discounts the weight by 10%). Quotes are shown exactly as written, linked to the original review, and cryptographically signed so you can check they have not been altered.Full methodology ↗ · Transparency report ↗
Cite this page
Citatio (2026). Thermo Fisher Scientific Reviews October 2026 – 4.7/5 from 2,045 revie. Retrieved 7 October 2026 from https://citatio.ai/thermofisher-reviews/
Data verifiable via our public audit log: Methodology · Transparency